Convergence or Divergence in Future? Comparative Analysis between the WTO SCM Agreement and the Agreement on Agriculture

Minju Kim

Global Politics Review
Vol. 1, No. 1 (October 2015): 63-81.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1238592
GPR ID: 2464-9929_v01_i01_p63
Published: 30 October 2015

Abstract: The World Trade Organization (WTO) has treated agricultural subsidies as exceptional. Under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994, subsidies are in general regulated under the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (the SCM Agreement) while agricultural subsidies are regulated under the Agreement on Agriculture (the AoA). This paper delves into the historical backgrounds of diverging regulatory patterns of the two by referring to the legal documents from the ITO Havana Charter in 1948 to the GATT 1994. Along with the historical review, rationales for justifying the exceptional status of agricultural products are thoroughly examined. This paper concludes that convergence of the SCM Agreement and the AoA is required in the long-run for strengthening the legal consistency and fairness of the WTO subsidies regime.

Keywords: WTO, Subsidies, Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, the Agreement on Agriculture, Convergence.

Copyright by the Author.  This is an Open Access article licensed by Global Politics Review under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License Creative Commons License// Disclaimer: the copyright and license of this article changed on October 30, 2017, when GPR became Open Access. The PDF file has not been updated for archival purposes. //


Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Homepage • Archive •  Submission Guidelines •  Contacts